ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
A bibliometric analysis of the current state of research on family interventions for ASD.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors and a prediction model for ASD symptoms in Chinese preschool children.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, family intervention has become a hot research direction in the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) treatment. A large amount of research literature shows that family intervention is effective in ASD rehabilitation. Still, the concept of family intervention is vaguely defined, and there is a lack of descriptions of specific intervention programs and treatment pathways and a diversity of intervention programs have been reported. In this study, we conducted an econometric analysis of the literature on family intervention for ASD to clarify the concept of family intervention and to analyze and explore the research hotspots, effective family intervention models for ASD, intervention techniques, and possible future research directions in this field. Methods: A metrological analysis of the literature related to ASD family interventions on the Web of Science from 1987 to 2024 was conducted using CiteSpace software to map the network of countries/institutions, journals, authors, co-cited literature, and keywords in the field. The results were visualized and analyzed. Results: A total of 1,891 documents were retrieved. The United States (1,028) led in the number and relevance of publications, followed by Canada (254) and Australia (209). The trend of publications was upward. Baranek was the most published author (19) and the University of California System was the most published university. Developed countries dominate the research. According to the timeline graph, it can be learned that the current research hotspots in this field are mostly focused on early intervention in family-based, psychological stress in parents of children with autism. Conclusion: This visual analysis identifies the most influential institutions and countries, as well as cited journals and authors in the field of family therapy autism research. The direction of research in family therapy for autism should be to find effective treatments for autism based on the home environment, and currently, the most prominent family therapy for autism is telemedicine and parent-mediated intervention. The future direction of this research area could be taken by artificial intelligence techniques specifically applied to children with autism in a computer context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.