ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Declarative memory profiles in children with non-specific intellectual disability: a cluster analysis approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking cognitive assessment in mild intellectual disability: evidence-based recommendations for a person-centered diagnostic framework.Health psychology report · 2026Article
- Reading and Writing Abilities in Students with Mild Nonspecific Intellectual Disability: A Multivariate Examination of Literacy and Cognitive Processing Abilities.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intellectual disability (ID) is increasingly being understood as a multidimensional condition that requires assessment beyond general intelligence. While traditional approaches focus on IQ, memory impairment plays a critical role in learning and adaptation. This study explored the declarative memory profiles of individuals diagnosed with non-specific intellectual disability (NSID) to identify cognitive patterns that may inform intervention strategies. Methods: The study included 114 individuals (56 girls and 58 boys) aged 10-17 years with a confirmed mild NSID diagnosis. The participants underwent a comprehensive declarative memory assessment using the Polish version of the Test of Memory and Learning, Second Edition (TOMAL-2). A subset of 68 participants was assessed using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5). Cluster analyses were performed to identify memory profiles based on the TOMAL-2 indices and their relationships with intelligence measures. Results: Two distinct memory profiles were identified. Cluster 1 (53% of the sample) exhibited lower scores across all memory indices, particularly for free recall, associative recall, and learning efficiency. Cluster 2 (47%) demonstrated relatively preserved memory abilities. Further analysis incorporating IQ measures showed that nonverbal intelligence was more strongly associated with memory performance than verbal intelligence. Notably, learning efficiency, rather than delayed verbal recall, was the strongest differentiator between the clusters. Conclusions: These findings highlight the heterogeneity of memory abilities in NSID, emphasizing the need for cognitive profiling beyond IQ. Learning potential may be a more predictive factor of functional outcomes, warranting further research and targeted interventions to enhance the adaptive capabilities in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.