Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405774›Full record

ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2025

Effect of Midline Deviation and Crown Width Disproportion on Perception of Smile Esthetics.

Bora Korkut, Ibrahim Ograk, Naci Murat, Panagiotis Ntovas, Ezgi Tuter Bayraktar, Ayse Asli Senol, Roberto Sorrentino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Midline Deviation and Crown Width Disproportion on Perception of Smile Esthetics.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bora KorkutDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ibrahim OgrakDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Naci MuratDepartment of Industrial Engineering Dentistry, Engineering Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.
Panagiotis NtovasDepartment of Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1349-2548
Ezgi Tuter BayraktarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9087-493X
Ayse Asli SenolDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Roberto SorrentinoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Scientific Unit of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry (SUDD), University Federico II, Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effect of maxillary midline deviation and crown width disproportion on the perception of smile attractiveness through full-face images among dentists and laypeople. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A full portrait image of a smiling 25-year-old female, exhibiting good dental alignment, midline position, and tooth size symmetry, was selected as a model for the present study. The original image was digitally modified using photo editing software (Photoshop CC, Version 25.12.0; Adobe) to simulate three different case scenarios of varying levels: Midline deviation (1-4 mm), single crown width disproportion, separately for central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine (1 and 2 mm), and crown width disproportions distributed to anterior teeth (1-4 mm). In total, 15 modified images were displayed randomly to 180 observers (90 laypeople and 90 dentists) including the original image that served as a control. Each observer scored the level of smile esthetics for each image using a visual analog scale ranging from point 0 (unattractive) to 100 (attractive). Bonferroni Test and Partial Eta Squared were utilized for the statistical data analyses (α < 0.05).

resultsAttractiveness scores were significantly lower for the modified smiles with the single crown width disproportion than distributed crown width disproportion and midline deviation (p < 0.001 for each), of which two presented statistically similar attractiveness (p = 0.278). The highest attractiveness scores were obtained for the control image (90.35 ± 5.56

conclusionsDentofacial midline discrepancy had less effect on smile attractiveness compared to crown width disproportions. Midline deviations up to 2 mm were not noticeable for both laypeople and dentists. The deviations of 3 mm were noticeable but still more attractive than the deviations of 4 mm, which were considered the least attractive. A single crown width disproportion was less perceived when moving from the central incisor toward the canine. Distributing the crown width disproportions among anterior teeth can be beneficial for smile attractiveness compared to non-distributed cases. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Generating symmetrical crown width proportions of the anterior teeth seems more important for smile esthetics than dentofacial midline harmony. Distribution of crown width disproportions among the anterior teeth can enhance smile esthetics.

Indexed as

Esthetics, DentalSmilingTooth CrownAdultDentistsFemaleHumansIncisorMaleMaxillaoperative dentistryorthodonticsorthodontics/restorativepediatric dentistryprosthodontics

Identifiers

PMID40405774
PMCPMC12315618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.