ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2025
An overview of artificial intelligence and machine learning in shoulder surgery.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a multicenter cohort study.JSES international · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Aging Biology of Bone-to-Tendon Healing and the Epigenetic Clock: A Biological-Age Readout of Rotator Cuff Healing Capacity.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Bioinspired Superhydrophobic Photothermal Anti-/Deicing Coatings.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for postoperative plain radiographic assessment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current evidence, clinical readiness, and limitations.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Multimodal Fusion of Multi-Sequence MRI and Clinical Metadata for the Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in shoulder arthroplasty: latest concepts and clinical integration.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of SLAP lesions on shoulder MRI using a 2.5D deep learning and ensemble learning framework.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Musculoskeletal Digital Therapeutics and Digital Health Rehabilitation: A Global Paradigm Shift in Orthopedic Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), utilizes advanced algorithms to learn patterns from data, enabling accurate predictions and decision-making without explicit programming. In orthopedic surgery, ML is transforming clinical practice, particularly in shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff tears (RCTs) management. This review explores the fundamental paradigms of ML, including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, alongside key algorithms such as XGBoost, neural networks, and generative adversarial networks. In shoulder arthroplasty, ML accurately predicts postoperative outcomes, complications, and implant selection, facilitating personalized surgical planning and cost optimization. Predictive models, including ensemble learning methods, achieve over 90% accuracy in forecasting complications, while neural networks enhance surgical precision through AI-assisted navigation. In RCTs treatment, ML enhances diagnostic accuracy using deep learning models on magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, achieving area under the curve values exceeding 0.90. ML models also predict tear reparability with 85% accuracy and postoperative functional outcomes, including range of motion and patient-reported outcomes. Despite remarkable advancements, challenges such as data variability, model interpretability, and integration into clinical workflows persist. Future directions involve federated learning for robust model generalization and explainable AI to enhance transparency. ML continues to revolutionize orthopedic care by providing data-driven, personalized treatment strategies and optimizing surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.