ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Ecological Momentary Assessment in Eating Disorders Research: A Qualitative Examination of Participant Experience and Recommendations for Future Studies.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An Idiographic, Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Adolescent-Dog Relationships in the Context of Social Anxiety.Child & youth care forum · 2026Article
- Ecological Momentary Assessment in Eating Disorders Research: A Qualitative Examination of Participant Experience and Recommendations for Future Studies.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Acceptability of a personalised single-session feedback intervention for eating disorders: a qualitative content analysis.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEcological momentary assessment (EMA) is a widely-used research method for investigating temporal relationships among eating disorder (ED) symptoms. Though EMA has many methodological advantages (e.g., reducing retrospective recall bias), little is known about the experience and effects of participating in this type of study from the perspective of individuals with EDs. The present study aimed to examine the experience of participants with EDs after completing an EMA study, with the goal of elucidating potential positive and negative effects of EMA methodology.
methodA heterogeneous sample of participants with EDs (N = 192) completed clinical interviews, questionnaires, and an EMA protocol (five surveys/day for 14 days). A subsample of these participants (n = 16) completed a qualitative interview exploring their experience participating in the study. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using Nvivo software.
resultsThe following themes were identified: (1) Self-awareness, mindfulness, and reflection; (2) Behavioral change; (3) Rewarding aspects of the study; (4) Challenging aspects of the study; (5) Study design (including facilitators and barriers to participating); and (6) Suggestions for future studies. DISCUSSION: Although participants reported some challenging aspects of the study, most described their experience as positive (or at least neutral), and many noted direct benefits of participating. Future EMA research may benefit from integrating the perspectives of those with lived experience into study design, potentially reducing participant burden, improving the quantity and quality of data collected, and increasing benefits for participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.