Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405576›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Quality of discharge letters concerning readmissions to mental healthcare: case-control study.

Miriam Hartveit, Harald Bjarne Hellesen, Jostein Helgeland, Olav Thorsen, Jörg Assmus, Eva Biringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miriam HartveitDepartment of Research and Innovation, Fonna Hospital Trust, Valen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7143-2236
Harald Bjarne HellesenSuldal General Practitioners Center, Suldal Municipality, Suldal, Norway.
Jostein HelgelandHaugesund Health Care Office, Haugesund Municipality, Haugesund, Norway.
Olav ThorsenStavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Jörg AssmusCentre for Clinical Research, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Eva BiringerDepartment of Research and Innovation, Fonna Hospital Trust, Stord, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the quality of 100 discharge letters from mental health specialists to better understand the role of cross-sectoral communication in patients' readmissions or other unplanned recontacts with mental health specialist care. Using a case-control design, we compared 50 letters for patients readmitted or for whom a formal request for additional specialist mental healthcare was made by the patient's GP (recontact) within 30 days of discharge, and 50 letters for those without readmission or recontact. The 26-item checklist Quality of Discharge letters - Mental Health was used to assess discharge letter quality. No significant differences in total checklist scores were found, suggesting that discharge letter quality does not influence the rates of readmission or unplanned recontact in mental healthcare.

Indexed as

mental healthPatient dischargepatient handoffpatient readmission

Identifiers

PMID40405576
PMCPMC12188235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.