Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405575›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

A systematic, standard-based, participatory assessment of a Continuous Quality Improvement project in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: results for maternal care.

Tinatin Gagua, Dimitry Beglitse, Anna Calancae, Dilrabo Yunusova, Arsen Askerov, Zarina Ibragimova, Asel Orozalieva, Nurshaim Tilenbaeva, Shoira Yusupova, Oleg Kuzmenko and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tinatin GaguaDavit Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Dimitry BeglitseMedical institute named after S. I. Georgievsky of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russia.
Anna CalancaeMother and Child Institute, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Dilrabo YunusovaDepartment of Safe Motherhood and Family Planning, Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the population of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Arsen AskerovMinistry of Health of the Kyrgyz Republic, Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of the Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Zarina IbragimovaAssociation of Midwives in Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Asel OrozalievaAlliance of Midwives of the Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Nurshaim TilenbaevaQuality of Care and Patient Safety Office, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Athens, Greece.
Shoira YusupovaWHO Country Office of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Oleg KuzmenkoSexual and Reproductive Health Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sophie JullienQuality of Care and Patient Safety Office, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Athens, Greece.
Martin W WeberQuality of Care and Patient Safety Office, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Athens, Greece.
Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Quality of Maternal Care Quality Improvement Group

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maternal health care quality remains challenging in low- and middle-income countries, including Central Asia, where access to effective care is limited. While quality improvement (QI) interventions have been introduced, their impact is rarely evaluated. This study evaluates the effects of a two-year, complex QI intervention to improve maternal health services in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Methods: We employed a pre-post intervention design to evaluate improvements in maternal health care quality in 19 hospitals across Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Following an initial assessment, an action plan was developed using a WHO-standardised tool. The study implemented a multi-faceted intervention to improve maternal health. A 0-3 scoring system measured changes over time. No control group was included. Results: In Kyrgyzstan, significant improvements were observed in caesarean section management (mean (x̄) = 1.9-2.1, P = 0.01), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.01), postpartum haemorrhage management (x̄ = 1.8-2.1, P = 0.03), and preeclampsia management (x̄ = 1.4-1.9, P = 0.01). Changes in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.6-1.8, P = 0.68) and infection control policies (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.32) were not statistically significant. In Tajikistan, statistically significant improvements were seen in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), routine labour and vaginal birth care (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), infection control policies (x̄ = 1.4-1.8, P = 0.03), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.5-2.1, P = 0.02), postpartum haemorrhage (x̄ = 1.7-2.1, P = 0.04), and labour progress (x̄ = 1.2-2.1, P = 0.01). However, changes in caesarean section management (x̄ = 1.7-2.3, P = 0.09) and emergency preparedness (x̄ = 1.6-2.3, P = 0.11) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The WHO-guided participatory approach set benchmarks that improved labour management, obstetric care, infection control, and infrastructure. Expanding such initiatives, especially in underserved areas, is vital to sustain and scale their impact on maternal health.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesQuality ImprovementAdultFemaleHumansKyrgyzstanPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsProgram EvaluationTajikistan

Identifiers

PMID40405575
PMCPMC12099276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.