ArticleJournal of global health2025
A systematic, standard-based, participatory assessment of a Continuous Quality Improvement project in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: results for maternal care.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of medical services provided to mothers, newborns and children at the hospital level in the Kyrgyz Republic.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Improving the quality of care for mothers, newborns, and children in ten hospitals of the Republic of Tajikistan.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Paediatric care in hospitals in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: impact of a quality improvement initiative.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Advancing the quality of maternal, newborn, and child healthcare: insights from pilot hospitals in the Kyrgyz Republic.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Maternal health care quality remains challenging in low- and middle-income countries, including Central Asia, where access to effective care is limited. While quality improvement (QI) interventions have been introduced, their impact is rarely evaluated. This study evaluates the effects of a two-year, complex QI intervention to improve maternal health services in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Methods: We employed a pre-post intervention design to evaluate improvements in maternal health care quality in 19 hospitals across Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Following an initial assessment, an action plan was developed using a WHO-standardised tool. The study implemented a multi-faceted intervention to improve maternal health. A 0-3 scoring system measured changes over time. No control group was included. Results: In Kyrgyzstan, significant improvements were observed in caesarean section management (mean (x̄) = 1.9-2.1, P = 0.01), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.01), postpartum haemorrhage management (x̄ = 1.8-2.1, P = 0.03), and preeclampsia management (x̄ = 1.4-1.9, P = 0.01). Changes in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.6-1.8, P = 0.68) and infection control policies (x̄ = 1.6-1.9, P = 0.32) were not statistically significant. In Tajikistan, statistically significant improvements were seen in hospital support services (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), routine labour and vaginal birth care (x̄ = 1.4-2.0, P = 0.01), infection control policies (x̄ = 1.4-1.8, P = 0.03), maternal complications management (x̄ = 1.5-2.1, P = 0.02), postpartum haemorrhage (x̄ = 1.7-2.1, P = 0.04), and labour progress (x̄ = 1.2-2.1, P = 0.01). However, changes in caesarean section management (x̄ = 1.7-2.3, P = 0.09) and emergency preparedness (x̄ = 1.6-2.3, P = 0.11) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The WHO-guided participatory approach set benchmarks that improved labour management, obstetric care, infection control, and infrastructure. Expanding such initiatives, especially in underserved areas, is vital to sustain and scale their impact on maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.