Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405568›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2025

The Effects of the Blood-Based S2,3PSA% Test on Prostate Cancer Screening: A Novel Approach to Reduce the Need for MRI and Unnecessary Biopsies.

Hikari Miura, Tomoko Hamaya, Tohru Yoneyama, Tadashi Shimoyama, Fumiyasu Tsushima, Kyo Togashi, Yuki Miura, Anna Yoneyama, Hiroyuki Sato, Sosuke Omizo and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Total PSA: Clinical Significance of S2,3PSA% in Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hikari MiuraDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Tomoko HamayaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Tohru YoneyamaDepartment of Glycotechnology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1098-407X
Tadashi ShimoyamaAomori General Health Examination Center, Aomori, Japan.
Fumiyasu TsushimaDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Kyo TogashiDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yuki MiuraDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Anna YoneyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hiroyuki SatoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Sosuke OmizoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Kazuyuki MoriDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hirotake KodamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Naoki FujitaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8284-9582
Teppei OkamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hayato YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Shingo KakedaDepartment of Radiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0026-4079

Funding

The study was supported by the FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProstate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening has reduced prostate cancer (PCa) mortality but is associated with overdiagnosis/overtreatment. We developed and evaluated a blood-based S2,3PSA% test to address the limitations of PSA-based screening for PCa.

methodsThis retrospective study included men aged ≤ 75 years who underwent opportunistic PSA and S2,3PSA% screening between April 2022 and March 2023. Secondary screening was recommended for participants with PSA ≥ 2.0 ng/mL and S2,3PSA% ≥ 38.0%, or PSA ≥ 4.0 ng/mL. The primary outcome was the reduction in MRI utilization based on an S2,3PSA% cutoff of ≥ 38.0%. Secondary outcomes included the PCa detection rate, as well as reductions in prostate biopsies and medical costs.

resultsAmong 808 participants who underwent PSA and S2,3PSA% screening, 190 met the criteria for secondary screening. Of these, 72 underwent further evaluation, including MRI in 65 participants. MRI findings excluded 22 (33.8%) participants from requiring prostate biopsy. Ultimately, 25 participants underwent prostate biopsy, and PCa was diagnosed in 17 (68.0%), including 12 with clinically significant PCa. The combined use of PSA, S2,3PSA%, and MRI resulted in a 44% reduction in MRI use, a 63% reduction in unnecessary biopsies, and a 72% reduction in medical costs. Study limitations include the small sample size and lack of evaluation of participants with negative S2,3PSA% or MRI findings.

conclusionsS2,3PSA% screening may have potential as a tool to reduce the need for MRI, unnecessary biopsies, and medical costs.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstateRetrospective StudiesUnnecessary ProceduresProstate-Specific Antigenbiopsycost reductionMRIprostate cancerPSAS2,3PSA%

Identifiers

PMID40405568
PMCPMC12211547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.