ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Leveraging Qualitative Insights for Dashboard Development to Address Perinatal Health Inequalities in Maternity, Neonatal and Perinatal Services.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPerinatal health inequalities, referring to disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes among different ethnic groups, persist despite numerous calls to action. A quality improvement initiative, such as the perinatal health inequality dashboard, could serve as a tool to provide real-time data, highlight trends and patterns, and capture and analyse disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes across various population groups.
aimTo explore the development process of the perinatal health inequality dashboard and conduct a preliminary evaluation of the barriers and facilitators in effectively presenting data and highlighting disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes on the dashboard in the Leicester, Leicestershire, and Rutland (LLR) region in the United Kingdom.
methodA qualitative study was conducted at the University Hospital of Leicester (UHL) involving the dashboard development team and end users, who are clinicians specializing in obstetrics, neonatal care, and perinatal mental health from the Leicester, Leicestershire, and Rutland (LLR) region. Ten clinicians were interviewed using a semi-structured approach over a 3-month period. The data were analysed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's method.
resultsThe study findings are presented in two sections: the dashboard development process and dashboard evaluation. Key themes in the development process include data sourcing, integration, and accuracy in neonatal care. Evaluation themes focus on the potential impact of the dashboard, a user-friendly interface, balancing qualitative and quantitative data, sustainability through continuous oversight, and system integration and interoperability. These findings offer critical insights for the ongoing refinement and effective deployment of the dashboard.
conclusionThe dashboard has the potential to improve health outcomes based on clinicians' insights. However, continuous refinement and modification of its functionality are necessary to address the challenges associated with its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.