ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
Diagnosis of flexor hallucis longus tenosynovitis using the cross-sectional area of the flexor hallucis longus tendon.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlexor hallucis longus tenosynovitis (FHLTS) is the inflammation of the sheath through which the flexor hallucis longus tendon (FHLT) passes. The FHLT thickness (FHLTT) is correlated with ankle pain. Thus, the FHLTT is considered a characteristic FHLTS feature. However, asymmetrical thickening of the FHLT can occur at any point. Therefore, we used the FHLT cross-sectional area (FHLTCSA) as a new morphological parameter to diagnose FHLTS.
methods26 participants in the Control group (Group 1) and 26 in the FHLTS group (Group 2) underwent magnetic resonance imaging. The FHLTCSA was calculated for the ligament based on the images showing the maximum hypertrophic changes. The FHLTT was measured based on the images showing the FHLT with the maximum thickness.
resultsThe mean FHLTCSA was 7.86 ± 1.88 mm2 and 13.11 ± 2.31 mm2 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The average FHLTT was 2.35 ± 0.55 mm and 2.91 ± 0.37 mm in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The FHLTCSA (P < 0.001) and FHLTT (P < 0.001) in Group 2 were significantly greater than those in Group 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff value for the FHLTCSA was 10.37 mm2, with a sensitivity of 92.3%, a specificity of 92.3%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. The optimal cutoff value for the FHLTT was 2.71 mm, with a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 76.9%, and an AUC of 0.84.
conclusionsThe FHLTCSA is a sensitive morphological parameter for assessing FHLTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.