Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405471›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

A Biomarker Signature-Guided Clinical Trial Design for Precision Medicine.

Yuan Li, Dejian Lai, Ruosha Li, Han Chen, Xuelin Huang, Jing Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuan LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7842-6190
Dejian LaiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Ruosha LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3595-4392
Han ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Xuelin HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-9336
Jing NingDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-331X

Funding

UPR/MDACC Partnership for Excellence in Cancer Research (Luis Segarra supplement)U54CA096300 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHARON Hermes GIORDANO, Paul A Scheet · 2002 to 2026
$23.8M
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Ovarian CancerP50CA281701 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ying Yuan · 2023 to 2026
$11.5M
Statistical Methods for Integration of Multiple Data Sources toward Precision Cancer MedicineR01CA269696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JING NING, YU SHEN · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
Optimizing treatment decision by accounting for longitudinal biomarker trajectories and competing risks of each individualR01CA272806 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Xuelin Huang · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Dr. Mien-Chie Hung and Mrs. Kinglan Hung Endowed Professorship of MD Anderson Cancer CenterNCI NIH HHS P50 CA281701NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269696NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272806NCI NIH HHS U54 CA096300NIH HHS P50CA281701NIH HHS R01CA269696NIH HHS R01CA272806NIH HHS U54CA096300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted cancer therapies aim to effectively treat patients with specific biomarker profiles. Nevertheless, these therapies may not always precisely hit their intended targets, leading to uncertainty about the specific subset of patients who will benefit. To address this uncertainty, the identification of sensitive patient subsets in clinical trials becomes crucial. Our proposed phase IIB/III clinical trial design seeks to pinpoint a biomarker signature with precision, ensuring the accurate identification of patients who will respond to a specific treatment. This approach allows for the selective enrollment of sensitive patients to maximize benefits for trial participants. We incorporate Bayesian methodology to facilitate response-adaptive randomization, enhancing the likelihood that each participant receives his/her optimal treatment. Furthermore, our design uses inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted analysis to avoid selection bias and control for the type I error rate. The evaluation of this trial design is based on four criteria: the statistical power, response rate of all patients participating in the current trial, their individual loss, and probabilities of receiving their optimal treatment for both current trial participants and future patients. Simulations demonstrate the proposed design's potential for maximizing trial participants' benefits with little sacrifice on statistical power. Its key advantages include an improved overall response rate within the trial and a higher percentage of patients receiving the optimal treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicPrecision MedicineResearch DesignBayes TheoremBiomarkersComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersBiomarkers, Tumoradaptive designBayesian adaptive randomizationclinical trialprecision medicinesignature design

Identifiers

PMID40405471
PMCPMC12247352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.