Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405444›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2025

Assessing Federal Policies to Reduce Economic Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment.

Daniel Albert-Rozenberg, David Peloquin, Joseph Liss, Erika Hanson, Barbara E Bierer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Albert-RozenbergQuinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, US.
David PeloquinRopes & Gray LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, US.
Joseph LissHogan Lovells, Washington, District of Columbia, US.
Erika HansonHarvard Law School, Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2127-9014
Barbara E BiererBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of losing access to crucial means-tested programs - like Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) - poses a barrier to the enrollment of low-income Americans in clinical trials. This burden likely disproportionately affects members of racial and ethnic minority groups, people with disabilities, elderly individuals, and rural populations, and may frustrate efforts to reflect the US population in clinical trial enrollment. To help achieve representative clinical trials for myriad conditions, Congress should pass legislation excluding payments to clinical trial participants from gross income and expand the clinical trial compensation exclusions for means-tested programs established in the Ensuring Access to Clinical Trials Act of 2015.

Indexed as

clinical trialsEntitlement Programsmeans-testedrepresentation

Identifiers

PMID40405444
PMCPMC12358237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.