ArticlemAbs2025
Process development for production of non-originator NISTmAb from CHO and NS0 cell lines.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of feeding strategies on culture performance and product quality in NISTCHO.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- NS0 and CHO cell lines generate distinct quality profiles for non-originator NISTmAbs.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell lines that produce non-originator versions of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) monoclonal antibody reference material 8671 (NISTmAb) are invaluable to the biopharmaceutical industry because, unlike typical commercial cell lines, they can be used on a collaborative and noncompetitive basis for bioprocess development. NIST has generated NS0 clones, NISTCHO research-grade test material 10197 and reference material 8675 NISTCHO to fill this need. We set out to optimize seed train procedures, media and feeding strategies, and stirred tank and rocking bioreactor processes to facilitate our studies on the effects of cell substrate and bioreactor process parameters on non-originator NISTmAb quality attributes. For two NS0 clones and NISTCHO, we improved the baseline methods for seed train culture and demonstrated the critical roles of agitation and gassing strategies for stirred-tank bioreactor operations. For NISTCHO we also tested fed-batch and perfusion processes in rocking bioreactors, identifying several critical process parameters and in-process controls. In this work, for the NIST NS0-59 and NS0-66 clones, we demonstrated that shake flask geometry was critical for culturing a highly viable seed train with a high growth rate and exhibited impacts of feeds, agitation, and gassing during initial bioreactor process development. We identified agitation rates and gassing strategy as critical process parameters for NISTCHO stirred-tank bioreactor operations and established processes for fed-batch and perfusion rocking bioreactor operations. We anticipate this work to benefit the growing number of researchers employing non-originator NISTmAb-expressing cell lines to support precompetitive innovation in biomanufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.