ArticleJournal of anatomy
Osteohistology of the Maastrichtian, small-bodied elasmosaurid Kawanectes lafquenianum (Sauropterygia; Plesiosauria).
Article in Journal of anatomy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Osteohistology of the Maastrichtian, small-bodied elasmosaurid Kawanectes lafquenianum (Sauropterygia; Plesiosauria).Journal of anatomyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plesiosauria is a clade of marine reptiles that thrived from the Late Triassic to the end of the Cretaceous. Among plesiosaurs, the elasmosaurids are particularly notable for their diverse body sizes. Small-sized specimens of Kawanectes lafquenianum exhibit fully closed neuro-central sutures indicating skeletal maturity. To independently assess whether they are indeed small-bodied adults, we analysed the paleohistology of long bones of three differently sized Kawanectes lafquenianum specimens recovered from the La Colonia Formation, Chubut Province, Argentina. The microanatomy of the bones revealed differences in the architectural organization of the hindlimbs and forelimbs, with the humerus being highly remodelled as compared to the femur. Extensive secondary reconstruction in the propodials and ribs suggests a high rate of calcium mobilization, perhaps related to biomechanical stresses. Despite the extensive secondary reconstruction in all the bones studied, primary bone tissue comprising parallel-fibred bone and lamellar bone was identified at the outermost cortex, along with an external fundamental system in the propodial bones of one of the specimens. Overall osteohistology features indicate an adult stage for all the specimens, although it appears that our sample represents individuals at different levels of maturity. Lines of arrested growth were also registered, giving a minimum age of 11 and 14 years for the specimens MPEF-PV 1155 and MPEF-PV 11545, respectively. These results indicated that K. lafquenianum is a small-bodied elasmosaurid (3.8 m-4.2 m in body length). Additionally, the bone microstructure of the postcranial elements reflects interelemental variability. Further research involving additional specimens is needed to explore other palaeobiological aspects of Kawanectes lafquenianum, such as growth dynamics, sexual dimorphisms, locomotion, among others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.