ReviewInfectious diseases of poverty2025
Geospatial and modelling analyses reveal diverse tick and tick-associated microbes in the East African Community.
Review in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- African tick-borne viruses: A systematic review of diversity, epidemiology, clinical impact, and one health strategies.Veterinary research communications · 2026Pooled it
- Climate-Driven Distribution and Ecological Niche Modeling of ThreeTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe continuous geographic expansion of ticks and the emergence of tick-borne diseases have raised tremendous global public health concerns, particularly in the East African Community (EAC). This study aimed to investigate the distribution of ticks and tick-associated microbes and to predict the potential extension of dominant tick species in the EAC.
methodsData were collected from literature reviews and related websites and analyzed using ArcGIS to generate maps showing the geographical distribution of ticks and associated microbes. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the positive rates of microbes. Ecological niche modelling was used to project the potential expansion of predominant tick species.
resultsA total of 138 tick species were recorded in the seven EAC countries, including five genera of the Argasidae family, eight of the Ixodidae family, and monospecific Nuttalliellidae. Overall, 64 tick-associated microbes, including 22 viruses, 26 bacteria, and 16 protists, were identified, of which 43 (11 viruses, 21 bacteria, and 11 protists) were pathogenic to humans or animals. Among them, 5 (2 viruses and 3 bacteria) have been reported in humans, while 10 pathogens (1 virus, 4 bacteria, and 5 protists) have been reported in animals. The predictive model identified suitable habitats for four dominant tick species, with certain species flourishing under ideal conditions, such as elevation, temperature, and vegetation. Our study revealed that ticks might affect broader areas where they have never been previously reported.
conclusionsTicks are widely prevalent in the EAC, and some ticks harbor a variety of microbial agents that can have significant pathogenetic implications for human and animal health. Therefore, EAC authorities and medical personnel should acknowledge the potential threat posed by ticks and tick-associated pathogens to the well-being of people and animals. Surveillance and etiological diagnosis should be enhanced to control ticks and prevent tick-borne infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.