ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
The impact of an 8-week integrated neuromuscular training on strength, speed, and agility in military personnel: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06663371 (The Impact of Integrated Neuromuscular Training Intervention on the Basic Physical Fitness of Military Personnel), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Integrated Neuromuscular Training Intervention on the Basic Physical Fitness of Military Personnel
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of an 8-week integrated neuromuscular training on lower limb functional asymmetry and balance in military personnel: a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Inspiratory muscle training in natural bodybuilders: adaptations in diaphragm muscle thickness and maximal strength.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the combined effects of integrated neuromuscular training (INT) and traditional physical training on enhancing the strength, speed, and agility of military personnel.
methodsA total of 20 military cadets (aged 18-22 years, predominantly male) were randomly assigned to either an INT group or a traditional physical training group. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks, with three sessions per week, each lasting 70-90 min. Countermovement jumps, 100 m sprints, and agility tests, were conducted at three time points: pre-intervention, 4 weeks post-intervention, and 8 weeks post-intervention for both groups. Maximum strength measurements, including bench press and squat, were compared at two time points: pre-intervention and post-intervention.
resultsThere were no significant baseline differences in gender, age, height, weight, and BMI between the two groups (p > 0.05). The results indicated that the INT group demonstrated significant improvements in countermovement jumps (7.1 cm increase), 100 m sprints (0.88 s reduction), and IAT (1.15 s reduction) at pre-intervention, 4 weeks post-intervention, and 8 weeks post-intervention (p < 0.05), whereas the traditional physical training group showed no significant differences between 4 weeks and 8 weeks post-intervention (p > 0.05). Inter-group comparisons revealed significant differences in 1RM bench press and squat values between the two groups (p < 0.05), and intra-group comparisons showed that the INT group had significantly greater improvements in 1RM bench press and squat compared to the traditional physical training group (p < 0.05).
conclusionOur findings suggest that an 8-week INT program leads to significantly greater improvements in strength, speed, and agility compared to traditional physical training, making it a promising approach for military conditioning programs.
trial registrationNCT06663371, Registration Date: 29/10/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.