Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405292›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2025

Porcine nasal organoids to model interactions between the swine nasal microbiota and the host.

Laura Bonillo-Lopez, Noelia Carmona-Vicente, Ferran Tarrés-Freixas, Karl Kochanowski, Jorge Martínez, Mònica Perez, Marina Sibila, Florencia Correa-Fiz, Virginia Aragon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Animal organoids as models for integrated One Health research.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SET-M33 peptide as a selectiveMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. iScience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. InactivatedFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura Bonillo-Lopez *Unitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Noelia Carmona-Vicente *Unitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain. noelia.carmona@irta.cat.
Ferran Tarrés-FreixasUnitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Karl KochanowskiUnitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Jorge MartínezUnitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Mònica PerezPrograma de Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Marina SibilaUnitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Florencia Correa-FizUnitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.
Virginia AragonUnitat mixta d'Investigació IRTA-UAB en Sanitat Animal, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInteractions between the nasal epithelium, commensal nasal microbiota, and respiratory pathogens play a key role in respiratory infections. Currently, there is a lack of experimental models to study such interactions under defined in vitro conditions. Here, we developed a porcine nasal organoid (PNO) system from nasal tissue of pigs as well as from cytological brushes.

resultsPNOs exhibited similar structure and cell types to the nasal mucosa, as evaluated by immunostaining. PNOs were inoculated with porcine commensal strains of Moraxella pluranimalium, Rothia nasimurium, and the pathobiont Glaesserella parasuis for examining host-commensal-pathogen interactions. All strains adhered to the PNOs, although at different levels. M. pluranimalium and G. parasuis strains stimulated the production of proinflammatory cytokines, whereas R. nasimurium induced the production of IFNγ and diminished the proinflammatory effect of the other strains.

conclusionsOverall, PNOs mimic the in vivo nasal mucosa and can be useful to perform host-microbe interaction studies. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsMicrobiotaNasal MucosaOrganoidsAnimalsCytokinesSwineCytokinesAirway organoid modelsHost-microbe interactionsMicrobial interactionsNasal microbiotaPorcine nasal organoids

Identifiers

PMID40405292
PMCPMC12100890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.