Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405290›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation attenuates changes in the concentration, phenotype, and response of immune peripheral blood cells in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary findings from the DHA-WIN trial.

Jaqueline Munhoz, Marnie Newell, Susan Goruk, Sunita Ghosh, Dhruvesh Patel, Anil Abraham Joy, Gilbert Bigras, Vera Mazurak, Kerry S Courneya, Denise G Hemmings and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jaqueline MunhozDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Marnie NewellDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Susan GorukDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Sunita GhoshDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Dhruvesh PatelDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Anil Abraham JoyDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Gilbert BigrasDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Vera MazurakDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Kerry S CourneyaFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H9, Canada.
Denise G HemmingsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T5G 0B6, Canada.
Catherine J FieldDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada. cjfield@ualberta.ca.

Funding

CIHR RES0037745Cross Cancer Institute Investigator Initiated Trials IIT-0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer neoadjuvant therapy may negatively impact the immune system. As a secondary outcome of the docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) for women with breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting (DHA-WIN trial), we sought to assess the effects of an intervention with DHA on parameters of immune function of women undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

methodsWomen with early-stage breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting were recruited for the DHA-WIN trial and randomly assigned to receive either 4.4 g/day of DHA or a placebo for 18 weeks in conjunction with their neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Venous blood was collected to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Immune parameters were assessed by measuring white blood cell concentration, flow cytometry, and cytokines concentration after mitogen-stimulated immune response.

resultsIn the placebo group the proportion of T cells (CD3 +), and functionally active monocytes (CD14 + HLA-DR +) was reduced at the last cycle of chemotherapy (15 weeks) but remained constant in the DHA group (P interaction < 0.05). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was maintained in the DHA group but increased in the placebo at the end of chemotherapy (P-interaction = 0.02). An increase in this ratio was associated with lower chance of achieving pathological complete response (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.14,0.16], P = 0.01). After 15 weeks of therapy, the DHA-supplemented group had higher concentrations of stimulated cytokines IL-4, IL-10, and the T helper type 1 cytokine IFN-γ after phytohemagglutinin (PHA) challenge, and higher concentrations of TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines after lipopolysaccharide exposure (P < 0.05).

conclusionSupplementing DHA during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved systemic immune function by attenuating changes in blood cell concentrations, preventing depletion of immune cells, and enhancing ex vivo cytokine secretion after stimulation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDietary SupplementsDocosahexaenoic AcidsAdultAgedCytokinesFemaleHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMiddle AgedMonocytesNeoadjuvant TherapyPhenotypeT-LymphocytesCytokinesDocosahexaenoic AcidsCytokinesImmune phenotypeImmune responseLong-chain polyunsaturated fatty acidPathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID40405290
PMCPMC12100857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.