Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405272›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

Benchmarking molecular conformer augmentation with context-enriched training: graph-based transformer versus GNN models.

Cecile Valsecchi, Jose A Arjona-Medina, Natalia Dyubankova, Ramil Nugmanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cecile ValsecchiDiscovery, Product Development and Supply, Janssen Cilag S.p.a., Viale Fulvio Testi 280/6, 20126, Milano, Italy. cvalsecc@its.jnj.com.
Jose A Arjona-MedinaDiscovery, Product Development and Supply, Janssen Cilag S.p.a., C. Río Jarama 75, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Natalia DyubankovaDiscovery, Product Development and Supply, Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium. ndyubank@its.jnj.com.
Ramil NugmanovDiscovery, Product Development and Supply, Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of molecular representation has witnessed a shift towards models trained on molecular structures represented by strings or graphs, with chemical information encoded in nodes and bonds. Graph-based representations offer a more realistic depiction and support 3D geometry and conformer-based augmentation. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Graph-based Transformer models (GTs) represent two paradigms in this field, with GT models emerging as a flexible alternative. In this study, we compare the performance of GT models against GNN models on three datasets. We explore the impact of training procedures, including context-enriched training through pretraining on quantum mechanical atomic-level properties and auxiliary task training. Our analysis focuses on sterimol parameters estimation, binding energy estimation, and generalization performance for transition metal complexes. We find that GT models with context-enriched training provide on par results compared to GNN models, with the added advantages of speed and flexibility. Our findings highlight the potential of GT models as a valid alternative for molecular representation learning tasks.

Indexed as

CheminformaticsDeep learningDrug discoveryGraphPretrainingQSARTransformers

Identifiers

PMID40405272
PMCPMC12100853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.