ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Benchmarking molecular conformer augmentation with context-enriched training: graph-based transformer versus GNN models.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technologies Shape Drug-Drug and Drug-Target Interaction Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Graph-based transformer to predict the octanol-water partition coefficient.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of molecular representation has witnessed a shift towards models trained on molecular structures represented by strings or graphs, with chemical information encoded in nodes and bonds. Graph-based representations offer a more realistic depiction and support 3D geometry and conformer-based augmentation. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Graph-based Transformer models (GTs) represent two paradigms in this field, with GT models emerging as a flexible alternative. In this study, we compare the performance of GT models against GNN models on three datasets. We explore the impact of training procedures, including context-enriched training through pretraining on quantum mechanical atomic-level properties and auxiliary task training. Our analysis focuses on sterimol parameters estimation, binding energy estimation, and generalization performance for transition metal complexes. We find that GT models with context-enriched training provide on par results compared to GNN models, with the added advantages of speed and flexibility. Our findings highlight the potential of GT models as a valid alternative for molecular representation learning tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.