ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
The positioning of policy documents in the field of health policy and systems research.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn realization of the importance of health policy, several scholars have examined health policies, contributing to the development of the field of health policy and systems research (HPSR). A growing body of literature within HPSR systematically analyses published articles in journals to examine how specific topics are dealt with in HPSR journals. The focus has extensively been on how research shapes policies and transfer of research to policy and practice. The present study takes a new approach in thinking about policy documents by exploring how policy documents are positioned in HPSR publications. In other words, the study answers the question of how policy documents are positioned in HPSR journal articles.
methodsThe study examined how policy documents were positioned in selected health policy journal articles. It analysed articles in Q1 journals indexed in Scopus under the journal subject health policy and published in 2022. A total of 52 articles were included in the full analysis. A data collection tool was created to tabulate extracted data which included data about journals, articles, and policy and methodological descriptions. Data were interpreted and analysed using descriptive statistics.
resultsOriginal research articles represented the majority of the analysed articles (72%). Multiple authorship was most common (63%), with authors from Western countries contributing the most to the publications. Analysed policies had a wide variety of foci and were mainly national-level policies (63%). Most of the articles included more than one policy for analysis (86%). Document analysis of policy documents was the only source of data in 33% of the articles. In addition, 27% of the articles lacked depth or details on how document analysis was conducted. The majority of the articles were aligned with policymaking as one phase of the policy process (31%).
conclusionsThe study reflects a primary effort to examine how policy documents are positioned in HPSR articles. The study's findings contribute to the extant literature on the limited use of document analysis in HPSR. It further extends the research policy gap by understanding policy documents as a primary data source for researchers with a clear lack of its consideration for policy implementation or evaluation. The study's findings introduce implications and provide recommendations for research, policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.