ArticleBMC nursing2025
A comparative study of Palestinian patient satisfaction with service quality in accredited government and private hospitals in the West bank.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Joint Commission International (JCI) Accreditation on Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Departments: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Astana, Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe implementation of accreditation affects healthcare institutions and enhances the quality of care and patient safety. Patient satisfaction is a key indicator in healthcare institutions, serving as a measure of service quality and its impact on patient outcomes. There is a lack of studies examining patient satisfaction with service quality in accredited hospitals in Palestine. Therefore, this study aimed to assess Palestinian patient satisfaction with service quality in accredited government and private hospitals in the West Bank and compare patient satisfaction between these hospitals.
methodsA descriptive comparative design was employed, with 150 patients undergoing elective surgeries recruited for the study. Data were collected using a self-reported questionnaire, which included the Service Quality (SERVQUAL) questionnaire and demographic information, between July and August 2023.
resultsThe participants were satisfied with service quality in both hospitals (M = 4.34, SD ± 0.73). The highest-rated dimension was assurance (M = 4.47, SD ± 0.60), while responsiveness received the lowest rating (M = 4.21, SD ± 0.90). Significant differences were found in the dimensions of tangibles, reliability, and empathy (p < 0.05), as well as in responsiveness (p ≤ 0.01) between the two types of hospitals. Patients who stayed longer in the hospital reported higher satisfaction with service quality.
conclusionThese findings may motivate policymakers to introduce accreditation programs across all healthcare sectors to improve care quality and ensure patient safety. Furthermore, accredited hospitals should adopt strategies to enhance patient satisfaction with service quality and address the areas with the lowest service ratings. CLINICAL TRIAL: No.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.