ArticleBMC nursing2025
Strategies to reduce cesarean deliveries: surveying Polish midwives and midwifery students on external cephalic version practices.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PRE-ECV Score: Validation of a Pre-Specified Tool for Predicting the Success of External Cephalic Version at Term-Proof of Concept.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and experiences of Polish midwives regarding the external cephalic version (ECV), as well as to examine their practices related to this procedure and the perceived barriers to its implementation. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional, online survey was conducted using a 22-item questionnaire developed by the authors. The survey targeted midwives and midwifery students, collecting demographic data, professional experiences, and detailed responses about knowledge, practices, and perceptions related to ECV.
resultsAmong 535 respondents, nearly one-third were midwifery students, and the rest were professional midwives (mainly with a master's degree). ECV was performed in over a quarter of respondents' workplaces, with 40% reporting personal experience with the procedure. Support for ECV in primiparas was highest among students and midwives with a master's degree, and lowest among those with a bachelor's. A similar pattern was observed in multiparas, with elective cesarean section more often chosen by bachelor 's-level midwives and least by students (p < 0.001). Less experienced midwives more frequently expressed concerns about complications and emergency cesarean delivery. Cesarean section was preferred in outpatient and prenatal class settings, while ECV was favored in clinical and district hospitals. Regardless of experience, the majority recognized the need for ECV training, with the strongest support among students (90.4%, p = 0.031).
conclusionsThe study highlights moderate awareness and limited experience with ECV among Polish midwives. The findings emphasize the necessity of structured educational programs to improve competency and confidence in ECV, particularly in outpatient and prenatal classes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.