SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Predictive value of machine learning for PD-L1 expression in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction of PD-L1 expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer using artificial intelligence models based on radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for non-invasive prediction of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for predicting PD-L1 high expression in resectable NSCLC: a dual-center study integrating [Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs machine learning (ML) continuously develops in cancer diagnosis and treatment, some researchers have attempted to predict the expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by ML. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence on the effectiveness of ML.
methodsWe conducted a thorough search across Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to December 14th, 2023.A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the value of ML for predicting PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.
resultsTotally 30 studies with 12,898 NSCLC patients were included. The thresholds of PD-L1 expression level were < 1%, 1-49%, and ≥ 50%. In the validation set, in the binary classification for PD-L1 ≥ 1%, the pooled C-index was 0.646 (95%CI: 0.587-0.705), 0.799 (95%CI: 0.782-0.817), 0.806 (95%CI: 0.753-0.858), and 0.800 (95%CI: 0.717-0.883), respectively, for the clinical feature-, radiomics-, radiomics + clinical feature-, and pathomics-based ML models; in the binary classification for PD-L1 ≥ 50%, the pooled C-index was 0.649 (95%CI: 0.553-0.744), 0.771 (95%CI: 0.728-0.814), and 0.826 (95%CI: 0.783-0.869), respectively, for the clinical feature-, radiomics-, and radiomics + clinical feature-based ML models.
conclusionsAt present, radiomics- or pathomics-based ML methods are applied for the prediction of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC, which both achieve satisfactory accuracy. In particular, the radiomics-based ML method seems to have wider clinical applicability as a non-invasive diagnostic tool. Both radiomics and pathomics serve as processing methods for medical images. In the future, we expect to develop medical image-based DL methods for intelligently predicting PD-L1 expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.