ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making in hospice care for advanced cancer patients in Nanjing: a descriptive qualitative study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A new paradigm for esophageal disease management: the application and future prospects of Shared Decision Making (SDM).World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the cancer burden increases in China, the need for hospice care is escalating. The right of informed consent to hospice care for patients with advanced cancer is still at the experimental stage, and patients still face numerous obstacles when it comes to participating in hospice care decision-making. In this context, we conducted a qualitative study to explore perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making (SDM) in hospice care for advanced cancer patients.
methodsThis study employed a descriptive phenomenological research method. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians recruited from 4 hospital in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China from January to March 2023. Two researchers used Colaizzi 7-step analysis method to analyze, summarize, integrate and refine the data.
resultsA total of 17 clinicians participated. Three main themes were extracted: (1) Clinician attitudes regarding SDM; (2) Influencing factors are multidimensional; (3) Recommendations for implementing SDM in hospice care decision-making.
conclusionSDM in hospice care for advanced cancer patients was affected by multiple factors in medical practice. It is highly desirable to focus on improving the decision support system, optimizing the SDM model of hospice care to ensure the informed choice of patients with advanced cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.