ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the feedback: a student-directed case-based collaborative learning Review committee.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Unpacking Factors Affecting Medical Students' Engagement in Educational Activities at University: A Mixed-Method Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Medical Students' Perspectives on Inclusivity Within Clinical Environments: A Pilot Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the various models of student representation in curriculum development across medical schools in the United States, based on the participatory governance theory. Recognizing the critical role of student feedback in enhancing medical education, the work sought to assess the diversity of student representation models, identify key elements that contribute to effective student involvement, and evaluate the potential impact on curriculum outcomes.
methodsAn initial list of 166 allopathic MD schools was curated from the AAMC Medical Schools Admission Requirements website. Schools were selected based on the presence of information about student representation in curriculum design. This selection was refined through a Google search using specific search terms related to student representation, followed by an evaluation based on the amount and relevance of available information on each school's website. The methodology involved a detailed examination of the websites for selected schools, focusing on the structure and organization of student involvement in curriculum development.
resultsOf the initial 166 medical schools, 49 (29.7%) had publicly available information on student involvement in curriculum development. These schools were categorized into three main models of student representation: direct representation, feedback-driven, and hybrid models. The analysis revealed significant diversity in how student representation is implemented, with each model exhibiting unique strengths and limitations. Direct representation models were found to facilitate substantive student roles in decision-making, feedback-driven models excelled in rapidly integrating student feedback into curricular adjustments, and hybrid models combined aspects of both to provide a comprehensive approach to student involvement.
conclusionsThere is no one-size-fits-all model for student representation in medical education. However, the hybrid model shows promise for its balanced approach to integrating student perspectives into curriculum development. Continuous evaluation and refinement of student representation models are essential for ensuring that medical education remains responsive to the needs of students and the evolving landscape of the medical field. This work underscores the importance of student feedback in medical education and advocates for further studies to quantify the impact of different models of student representation on educational outcomes and professional success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.