ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Machine learning prediction model with shap interpretation for chronic bronchitis risk assessment based on heavy metal exposure: a nationally representative study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Machine Learning in the Research of Heavy Metal(loid)s-Related Risk: A Scoping Review of Methodology.Toxics · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Integrative network toxicology and experimental evidence reveal mechanisms underlying diethyl phthalate-induced initiation and progression of endometrial cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic bronchitis (CB), as a core precursor of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), is crucial for global disease burden prevention and control. Although the association between heavy metal exposure and respiratory damage has been preliminarily demonstrated, traditional linear models are difficult to resolve the nonlinear interactions and dose-response heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to construct the first heavy metal exposure-chronic bronchitis risk prediction model by integrating exposureomics data through machine learning (ML).
methodsWeighted logistic regression was used to assess the association of 14 blood and urine heavy metals with CB based on nationally representative samples from the 2005-2015 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The Boruta algorithm was further applied to screen the characteristic variables and construct 10 ML models. The best model was selected by four evaluation metrics: accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the best model was visually interpreted using Shapley's additive interpretation (SHAP).
resultsThe multifactorial logistic regression model showed that urinary cadmium (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.17-1.98) versus blood cadmium (OR = 1.36, 1.13-1.65) was an independent risk factor for CB. The CatBoost model had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.805), with smoking as the most significant predictor, followed by blood cadmium concentration and gender.
conclusionIn this research, the first risk prediction diagnostic model for heavy metal-chronic bronchitis was developed, in which CatBoost model had the best performance, and it provides a referenceable prediction model for the screening of high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.