ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Patient characteristics and pharmacologic treatment patterns in antifibrotic-treated patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: real-world results from a claims database.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination antifibrotic and immunosuppressive therapy in progressive fibrosing ILD.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2026Article
- Electronic health record evidence suggests undercoding, underrecognition, and low antifibrotic use in progressive pulmonary fibrosis.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntifibrotics have been approved for use in many countries, including Japan, based on the results of several phase III clinical trials in patients with IPF, SSc-ILD, and PPF, which showed slower lung function decline with antifibrotic treatment. There is a paucity of information on the real-world use of antifibrotics in clinical practice.
methodsBaseline characteristics, comorbidities, and drugs used prior to and concomitant with antifibrotics were collected for patients with IPF, SSc-ILD, and PPF using a health insurance claims database in Japan from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2023. Descriptive statistics were generated for all study variables.
resultsThis study included 657 nintedanib users with IPF; 418 pirfenidone users with IPF; 4160 nintedanib users with PPF; 18,403 users of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants for ILD treatment with PPF; 676 nintedanib users with SSc-ILD; and 698 users of glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants for ILD treatment with SSc-ILD. At index, pirfenidone users with IPF were the oldest (mean [SD] 74.8 [7.3] years), and nintedanib users with SSc-ILD were the youngest (mean [SD] 65.6 [11.7] years). In nintedanib users with IPF, 76.7% were prescribed nintedanib as monotherapy, and 75.6% of pirfenidone users were prescribed pirfenidone, as monotherapy. In patients with IPF, 75.2% were prescribed nintedanib, and 76.1% were prescribed pirfenidone, as first-line therapy. In patients with SSc-ILD, 34.9% were prescribed nintedanib as monotherapy for ILD treatment, and 38.6% as first-line therapy. Approximately half of patients with PPF were prescribed nintedanib concomitantly with other glucocorticoids/immunosuppressant drugs, and after one or more glucocorticoids/immunosuppressant drugs. The most common concomitant drug in all patient groups was glucocorticoids. In patients with IPF, 18.6% of nintedanib users and 18.2% of pirfenidone users were prescribed glucocorticoids concomitantly. Concomitant glucocorticoid use was 52.7% for nintedanib users with SSc-ILD, and 44.1% for nintedanib users with PPF.
conclusionsThese results provide real-world evidence of antifibrotic use in clinical practice. Most patients with IPF were prescribed antifibrotics as monotherapy for ILD treatment whereas antifibrotics were used concomitantly with glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants in many patients with SSc-ILD and PPF. While most patients with IPF were prescribed antifibrotics as first-line therapy, patients with SSc-ILD and PPF were more likely to be prescribed nintedanib as second-line or later-line treatment after glucocorticoids/immunosuppressants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.