Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405128›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Global burden of low back pain from 1990 to 2021: a comprehensive analysis of risk factors and trends using the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.

Nan Yang, Jingkai Di, Weihao Wang, Haoyu Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Analysis of disease burden, attributable risk factors of low back pain in China from 1990 to 2023 and prediction for 2030].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nan Yang *Department of Orthopedics, The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Shanxi, China.
Jingkai Di *Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China.
Weihao WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Shanxi, China.
Haoyu FengDepartment of Orthopedics, The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Shanxi, China. fenghaoyuspine@126.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3601900 and 2022YFC3601904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study comprehensively assesses low back pain-related risk factors and the global burden from a multi-dimensional perspective, aiming to provide scientific evidence for disease prevention.

methodsData from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database spanning from 1990 to 2021 were incorporated into this study. We conducted an analysis of baseline data, as well as gender and age subgroup data. Additionally, we introduced the Age-Period-Cohort (APC) and decomposition analysis models to clarify the independent effects of factors such as age, period, cohort, population growth, population aging and changes in epidemiological trends on the disease burden. The Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC) was used to measure the temporal trends of health indicators. To enhance practical applicability, we constructed a model that integrates frontier analysis with health inequality assessment. Furthermore, the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model was employed to forecast trends in LBP over the next 15 years.

resultsIn 2021, the global age-standardized prevalence of low back pain decreased by 11.06% compared to that in 1990. However, the number of affected individuals increased from 386.7 million to 628.8 million. Concurrently, the age-standardized Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) rate declined by 11.22% relative to 1990, while total DALYs rose from 43,386,225 to 70,156,962. The results derived from multiple models indicate that higher socio-demographic index levels, advancing age, female sex and occupational ergonomics-related factors may contribute to disparities in the burden of low back pain. Furthermore, this unequal health gap appears to be widening over time.

conclusionsDisease burden of low back pain exhibit varying manifestations across different regions and temporal dimensions. Higher levels of the Socio-Demographic Index(SDI), increasing age, female gender and adverse occupational ergonomic factors may be important risk elements for the burden of low back pain. Meanwhile, certain changes in epidemiological trends may alleviate this burden to some extent. In the absence of effective intervention measures, the gaps in health inequality engendered by the aforementioned diverse factors are likely to expand continuously. In light of this, it is crucial to actively develop systematic, comprehensive and targeted health prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Global Burden of DiseaseLow Back PainAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGlobal HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung AdultAge-standardized disability-adjusted life years rateAge-standardized prevalence rateBurden of diseaseLow back painRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40405128
PMCPMC12096634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.