Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405061›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Impact of an abrupt change from dry to canned diet on digestive function and gut microbiota in dogs.

Marta Maturana, Lorena Castillejos, Achraf Adib Lesaux, Susana M Martin-Orue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta MaturanaAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-8801
Lorena CastillejosAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-192X
Achraf Adib LesauxPhileo by Lesaffre, Marcq-en-Baroeul, France.
Susana M Martin-OrueAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA), Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abrupt changes in diet can result in gastrointestinal upset in dogs but, although undesirable in households, they might represent a research tool to induce a mild state of transitory dysbiosis. Therefore, this type of dietary intervention could serve as a model for assessing the effect of feed additives aimed at promoting a more resilient gut ecosystem. In the current study, we examined the effects of an abrupt dietary change by assessing its impact on coefficients of apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of macronutrients, fecal characteristics, and fecal microbiota composition and metabolites of healthy dogs. A total of 24 adult Beagles were initially fed an extruded dry kibble (DRY) for 29 d, with proportions (%) of protein, fat, and carbohydrates, on a dry matter basis, of 26%, 12%, and 52%, respectively. Subsequently, they were abruptly switched to a canned diet (WET), with the corresponding proportions of 43%, 29%, and 16%, and stayed with that diet for 29 d more. This dietary intervention induced increases in the ATTD of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and gross energy, while the nitrogen-free extract ATTD and the metabolizable energy of the diet decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Regarding fecal quality, diet change resulted in wetter and less-formed feces. The switch led to a marked decrease in Turicibacter and Lactobacillus abundance and increases in Fusobacterium, Peptacetobacter hiranonis, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens (P < 0.001), accompanied by transient increases of the dysbiosis index, and plasma immunoglobulin A and C-reactive protein concentrations (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the challenge modified the concentration and profile of fecal short-chain fatty acids (P < 0.01) and increased the concentration of fecal ammonia (P < 0.05). It also had a relevant impact on fecal polyamines, with lower concentrations observed in dogs fed the WET diet (P < 0.001), while monoamines such as indole and indole-3-acetic acid increased (P < 0.05). Some of the parameters studied continued to evolve towards the end of the trial, suggesting an adaptative process within the microbiota, after the dietary shift. These findings underscore the validity of our dietary model for inducing changes in the intestinal ecosystem and suggest ongoing adaptive processes. In conclusion, this model offers the potential for evaluating the efficacy of additives in fostering a resilient microbiota, thereby promoting strategies to enhance canine digestive health.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietDigestionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDogsFecesFemaleFood, PreservedMaleBeagle dogsdietary changedysbiosis indexfecal metabolitesfecal microbiotamacronutrient digestibility

Identifiers

PMID40405061
PMCPMC12391870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.