Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405047›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Accounting for Carryover Toxicity in Phase I Clinical Trials with Intra-Patient Dose Escalation.

Chloe E Falke, Joseph S Koopmeiners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chloe E FalkeDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-2225
Joseph S KoopmeinersDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6147-3168

Funding

NIA NIH HHS U01-AG076929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-patient dose escalation (IPDE) provides a strategy for more efficient Phase I clinical trials. However, IPDE poses additional challenges due to the need to account for carryover toxicity from previous dosings a patient has received. To that end, we propose two CRM-based approaches to IPDE that incorporate potential carryover toxicity. We compare these methods to the CRM without IPDE and the AIDE-CRM, an existing Bayesian adaptive approach to IPDE. In simulations across a range of scenarios, we show that our approaches have similar operating characteristics to the CRM without IPDE, but with a 20% reduction in time and participants needed to complete the trial; these results hold even in the presence of strong carryover toxicity that hinders the performance of the AIDE-CRM.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseModels, StatisticalBayesian adaptive designdose findingintra‐patient dose escalationPhase I

Identifiers

PMID40405047
PMCPMC12098223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.