Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405031›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Awareness and utilization of genetic testing for hereditary cancers in cancer survivors: a cross-sectional 2021 HINTS-SEER study.

Kirithiga Ramalingam, Stephen Li, Meg McKinley, Robin C Vanderpool, Sarah H Nash, Salma Shariff-Marco, Aaron Scheffler, Erin L Van Blarigan, Mindy C DeRouen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kirithiga RamalingamDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stephen LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Meg McKinleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robin C VanderpoolHealth Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Sarah H NashDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Salma Shariff-MarcoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aaron SchefflerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Erin L Van BlariganDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mindy C DeRouenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. mindy.hebert-derouen@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
California Department of Public Health 1NU58DP007156Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS 3P30CA086862NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800002BNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800002CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to identify factors associated with genetic testing awareness and use among a large sample of US cancer survivors participating in NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey of cancer survivors identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, a unique pilot study expanding the number of cancer survivors typically captured by HINTS.

methodsWe analyzed 2021 HINTS-SEER data to determine sociodemographic factors associated with awareness and utilization of germline genetic testing using survey-weight-adjusted multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 1232 survivors (any site), the majority had breast (23%) or prostate (23%) cancer. Among the overall study population, 77% were aware of and 24% utilized genetic testing. Females and those with a college education, income over $100,000, or family history of cancer had greater odds of awareness compared to males, those with less than college education, income under $20,000, or no family history, respectively. Among prostate cancer survivors, those ≥ 65 years in age had lower odds of awareness. Females and the privately insured had greater odds of utilization compared to males and publicly insured, respectively. Those ≥ 65 years or retired had lower odds of utilization compared to < 65 years and being employed, respectively.

conclusionWe identified sociodemographic factors associated with awareness and utilization of germline genetic testing among cancer survivors. Findings warrant further investigation to understand mechanisms underlying disparities in awareness and use of genetic testing. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This study highlights cancer survivor populations that may require additional support around awareness of and use of germline genetic testing.

Indexed as

Cancer genetic testingCancer survivorsHINTS-SEERSociodemographic factors

Identifiers

PMID40405031
PMCPMC12754848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.