Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405016›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Validation of new AI-based classification method for in silico cardiac safety assessment of drugs following the CiPA framework.

Ulfa Latifa Hanum, Ali Ikhsanul Qauli, Yunendah Nur Fuadah, Rahmafatin Nurul Izza, Ki Moo Lim

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ulfa Latifa HanumDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Computational Medicine Lab, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, 39177, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-9129-8951
Ali Ikhsanul QauliDepartment of Engineering, Faculty of Advanced Technology and Multidiscipline, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 60115, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-3812
Yunendah Nur FuadahSchool of Electrical Engineering, Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4285-4824
Rahmafatin Nurul IzzaDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Computational Medicine Lab, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, 39177, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0003-0842-027X
Ki Moo LimDepartment of Medical IT Convergence Engineering, Computational Medicine Lab, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, 39177, Republic of Korea. kmlim@kumoh.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-8129

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 22213MFDS3922Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 24212MFDS266Ministry of Science and ICT Korea (MSIT) under the Grand Information Technology Research Center support program RS-2020-II201612National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under the Basic Science Research Program 2022R1A2C2006326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) has paved the way for integrating in silico trials into drug evaluation processes. In alignment, the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) has initiated efforts to update the ICH S7B and E14 guidelines through a structured Questions and Answers (Q&A) format. A significant challenge in this paradigm is ensuring consistent application and evaluation of diverse proarrhythmia risk prediction models across experimental systems. This study utilized the CiPAORdv1.0 model to predict cardiac toxicity, leveraging in vitro data from 28 drugs for training and validation. A modified O'Hara-Rudy model simulated a virtual population of human ventricular cell models. Seven critical features (qNet, APD50, APD90, Camax, Carest, CaTD50, CaTD90) were extracted as inputs for analysis. CiPAORdv1.0 demonstrated robust performance, achieving predictive accuracies with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0 for high risk and 0.95 for low-risk categories. The calibration process was enhanced using normalized Euclidean distances (R1 and R2), effectively distinguishing risk categories. Sensitivity analysis identified key drugs, ensuring a strong calibration drug set to anchor model predictions. The proposed ANN model validated the CiPAORdv1.0 framework as an effective TdP-risk prediction system, ensuring robust and lab-specific validation. This study presents a novel algorithm leveraging artificial neural networks to implement validated cardiac safety models, addressing a critical need for standardized proarrhythmia risk assessment in drug development.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacArtificial IntelligenceDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsCardiotoxicityComputer SimulationDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMyocytes, CardiacRisk AssessmentANN modelCalibration drugsCiPALab-specific validationSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.