ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Validation of new AI-based classification method for in silico cardiac safety assessment of drugs following the CiPA framework.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) has paved the way for integrating in silico trials into drug evaluation processes. In alignment, the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) has initiated efforts to update the ICH S7B and E14 guidelines through a structured Questions and Answers (Q&A) format. A significant challenge in this paradigm is ensuring consistent application and evaluation of diverse proarrhythmia risk prediction models across experimental systems. This study utilized the CiPAORdv1.0 model to predict cardiac toxicity, leveraging in vitro data from 28 drugs for training and validation. A modified O'Hara-Rudy model simulated a virtual population of human ventricular cell models. Seven critical features (qNet, APD50, APD90, Camax, Carest, CaTD50, CaTD90) were extracted as inputs for analysis. CiPAORdv1.0 demonstrated robust performance, achieving predictive accuracies with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0 for high risk and 0.95 for low-risk categories. The calibration process was enhanced using normalized Euclidean distances (R1 and R2), effectively distinguishing risk categories. Sensitivity analysis identified key drugs, ensuring a strong calibration drug set to anchor model predictions. The proposed ANN model validated the CiPAORdv1.0 framework as an effective TdP-risk prediction system, ensuring robust and lab-specific validation. This study presents a novel algorithm leveraging artificial neural networks to implement validated cardiac safety models, addressing a critical need for standardized proarrhythmia risk assessment in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40405016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.