Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405012›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Late radiation-associated dysphagia following treatment for head and neck cancer: a scoping review.

Diane Sellstrom, Joanne M Patterson, Tracy Finch, James O'Hara, Catherine Haighton

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A cross-sectional retrospective and prospective service evaluation of head and neck cancer patients' swallowing and quality of life concerns: are we doing enough?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diane SellstromThe Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK. diane.sellstrom1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-9648
Joanne M PattersonUniveristy of Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK.
Tracy FinchNorthumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
James O'HaraThe Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Catherine HaightonNorthumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North East and North Cumbria (NENC) NIHR200173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide an overview of existing literature reporting swallowing outcomes beyond two years post- head and neck cancer treatment. Objectives were to establish prevalence of late radiation-associated dysphagia (-RAD); identify risk factors of developing late-RAD and synthesise the dysphagia findings reported.

methodsThe PRISMA-ScR checklist for conducting scoping reviews was adopted. Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, OpenGrey, Google Scholar and Google Advanced were completed by December 2022. Eligibility criteria included studies written in English from 1996 reporting swallowing outcomes from 2 years or more post-treatment. Data was extracted from included studies, tabulated, synthesised and reported as categories.

resultsScreening 7671 studies resulted in 39 studies included in the review. There was wide variation in dysphagia outcome measures used and timing of collection across studies. Prevalence could not be established. All studies reported a degree of impairment in at least one measure in a proportion of patients. Numerous risk factors were identified (including tumour site, and T-classification, age, radiotherapy dose), but there were conflicting findings and meaningful synthesis was challenging. Characteristics of late-RAD included high aspiration rates; reduced efficiency of swallowing and lower cranial neuropathy.

conclusionSignificant gaps exist in the evidence base regarding late-RAD such as who is affected, why and what the trajectory of decline will be. Swallowing safety is often compromised. A consensus on the definition of late-RAD is needed along with increased uniformity in collection of outcome measures, in order to improve understanding and guide future research and service delivery models.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersHead and Neck NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsDysphagiaHead and neck cancerLate effectsRadiationSwallowing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.