Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405010›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2026

Traumatic Venous Sinus Thrombosis: Patient and Practice Patterns at a Major Trauma Center.

Deborah L Huang, Ritwik Bhatia, Rubinee Simmasalam, Jason F Talbott, Michael C Huang, Vineeta Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deborah L HuangDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. DeborahLhuang@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-912X
Ritwik BhatiaDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rubinee SimmasalamDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jason F TalbottDepartment of Radiology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael C HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Vineeta SinghDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injury can lead to venous sinus injury and thrombosis, which may be associated with elevated intracranial pressure and poor outcomes. We sought to examine the risk factors, management, and clinical outcomes of traumatic venous sinus thrombosis (tVST).

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of our institutional radiology database for final radiology reports from 2013 to 2022 that contained the terms "venous sinus thrombosis," "sinus thrombosis," or "venous occlusion." tVST was detected on computed tomography and confirmed by a board-certified neuroradiologist.

resultsWe identified 135 patients on initial screening and entered 112 into our final analysis. Patients were predominantly male (76.8%) and had a mean age of 44 years. Initial Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15, 9-12, and 3-8 were found in 60.7%, 12.5%, and 26.8% of our cohort, respectively. Eighty-nine patients (79.5%) were alive at hospital discharge. Most patients sustained skull fractures (n = 109, 97.3%), including skull base fractures. Seventeen patients required interventions for refractory intracranial hypertension, of whom 16 (94.1%) had multiple tVST. We observed heterogeneity in tVST monitoring and treatment practices. Patients received anticoagulation (AC; 13.4%), antiplatelet (AP; 34.8%), or conservative (no AC or AP; 51.8%) treatment for tVST. Follow-up imaging was available for 52 patients, showing recanalization of venous sinuses in 26 patients (50%) by 6 months post injury. Recanalization rates were higher in the AP group than in the AC group. However, this was likely the result of selection bias, in which patients with mild to moderate injuries were more likely to be assigned to AP therapy. We noted more bleeding complications in AC- and AP-treated patients (20.0% and 12.8%) than in conservatively managed patients (3.4%), even after adjusting for lower survival in the conservative group.

conclusionsDifferences between treatment groups should be cautiously interpreted due to selection bias and confounding by indication. More studies are needed to determine the optimal management of tVST.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBrain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial HypertensionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Sinus Thrombosis, IntracranialSkull FracturesTrauma CentersAdultAgedFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsCerebral veinsIntracranial sinus thrombosisTraumatic brain injuryTraumatic cerebral hemorrhageTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40405010
PMCPMC12819568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.