Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405006›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025

Youth matters: a systematic review of the molecular and clinical landscape of bladder cancer in young adults.

Ali Bourgi, Antoine Vincentelli, Emmanuel Rusch, Franck Bruyère

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali BourgiUrology Department, CHRU Tours, Tours, France. alibourgi@gmail.com.
Antoine VincentelliUrology Department, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.
Emmanuel RuschÉcole Doctorale Education, Ethique et Santé, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Franck BruyèreUrology Department, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer is uncommon in individuals under the age of 45, and its clinical and molecular characteristics in this population differ significantly from those observed in older patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate recurrence, progression, survival outcomes, and molecular profiles of bladder cancer in young adults.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases for studies published between 1998 and 2024. Eligible studies included patients aged ≤ 40 years and reported outcomes such as recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression, and overall survival (OS). A total of 18 studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis models.

resultsBladder cancer in young adults is predominantly non-muscle-invasive and low-grade, with high survival rates. Recurrence rates varied across studies, ranging from 0 to 35.9%, while disease progression was rare. Several studies reported 100% RFS and OS in pediatric and young adult populations. The molecular profile of tumors in younger patients differed from that of older adults, with lower rates of TP53 and FGFR3 mutations. Meta-analysis revealed favorable long-term outcomes, particularly in patients diagnosed at early stages.

conclusionBladder cancer in young adults presents a distinct clinical and molecular entity with excellent prognosis, minimal progression, and high survival. Despite this, recurrence remains a concern, highlighting the need for age-specific surveillance strategies and further research into molecular drivers of the disease in this age group.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAge FactorsDisease ProgressionHumansYoung AdultBladder cancerNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerOverall survivalRecurrence-free survivalYoung adults

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.