ArticleScientific reports2025
Technologically advanced running shoes reduce biomechanical factors of running related injury risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Stability Criterion for Men's Basketball Shoes During Mediolateral Cutting Maneuvers.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Economy benefits of running in advanced footwear technology shoes remain with plantarflexion fatigue.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Running Velocity as a Methodological Factor in Footwear Testing: Fixed Versus Self-Selected Conditions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent footwear technology has led to the development of technologically advanced running shoes (TARS), which improve running performance. However, the effect of TARS on biomechanical risk factor remains unclear. This study compares the effects of TARS with those of conventional cushioned shoes (CON) and minimalist shoes (MIN) on running biomechanics and biomechanical risk factors. We recruited 15 recreational runners, measured their ventilation threshold speeds and habitual strike angles, collected kinematic data and ground reaction forces across shoe conditions, and estimated joint reaction force and muscle force through inverse dynamic analysis. Results show that TARS significantly alter landing patterns by shifting runners toward a forefoot/midfoot strike patterns (mean strike angle decreased by 4.17° compared to CON) and reducing subtalar eversion during loading phase. While MIN increase peak ankle joint reaction force by 3.07 body weight (BW) compared to CON, TARS reduce it by 1.84 BW. TARS also decrease peak soleus and peroneus longus forces by 1.10 BW and 0.43 BW respectively, without increasing demands on any joint. These results suggest that TARS provide distinct biomechanical characteristics that reduce certain mechanical loads associated with running injuries. Our findings further suggest a need for reevaluating footwear classification methods and embracing technological advancements in running shoe design for potentially safer and more efficient running.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.