Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404916›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Technologically advanced running shoes reduce biomechanical factors of running related injury risk.

Hyunji Kim, Jooeun Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyunji KimDepartment of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea.
Jooeun AhnDepartment of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. ahnjooeun@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 20007058National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00208052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent footwear technology has led to the development of technologically advanced running shoes (TARS), which improve running performance. However, the effect of TARS on biomechanical risk factor remains unclear. This study compares the effects of TARS with those of conventional cushioned shoes (CON) and minimalist shoes (MIN) on running biomechanics and biomechanical risk factors. We recruited 15 recreational runners, measured their ventilation threshold speeds and habitual strike angles, collected kinematic data and ground reaction forces across shoe conditions, and estimated joint reaction force and muscle force through inverse dynamic analysis. Results show that TARS significantly alter landing patterns by shifting runners toward a forefoot/midfoot strike patterns (mean strike angle decreased by 4.17° compared to CON) and reducing subtalar eversion during loading phase. While MIN increase peak ankle joint reaction force by 3.07 body weight (BW) compared to CON, TARS reduce it by 1.84 BW. TARS also decrease peak soleus and peroneus longus forces by 1.10 BW and 0.43 BW respectively, without increasing demands on any joint. These results suggest that TARS provide distinct biomechanical characteristics that reduce certain mechanical loads associated with running injuries. Our findings further suggest a need for reevaluating footwear classification methods and embracing technological advancements in running shoe design for potentially safer and more efficient running.

Indexed as

RunningShoesAdultAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansMaleRisk FactorsYoung AdultFootwearMusculoskeletal modelingRunningRunning related injury

Identifiers

PMID40404916
PMCPMC12098673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.