ArticleScientific reports2025
Using ML techniques to predict extubation outcomes for patients with central nervous system injuries in the Yun-Gui Plateau.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
No predictive models have been reported for tracheostomy extubation success in plateau region rehabilitation departments. Hence, the primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the predictive capabilities of different models for extubation outcomes in CNS injury patients in plateau rehabilitation departments, as well as investigate the influence of clinical features on these outcomes. Data were collected from 501 adult tracheostomy patients in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, including 196 successful extubations. Logistic regression was employed to identify the significant features linked to extubation outcomes from a pool of 31 variables. A total of eight independent models and a weighted posterior voting ensemble model were developed. Hyperparameter optimization and tenfold cross-validation were used to assist in choosing model parameters. Random forest (ACC = 84.15, AUC = 0.85), extra trees (83.17%, 0.87), K-NN (82.18%, 0.85), and gradient boosting (81.19%, 0.85) performed well. An ensemble model (85.15%, 0.87) combining random forest, Gaussian naive Bayes, and K-NN via the WPV method was developed. Dysphagia and low GCS scores have been linked to increased difficulty in extubation, as indicated by SHAP values and previous studies. Moreover, there could be a relationship between chronic inflammation and albumin levels in patients, which may collectively impact extubation success. This study evaluated the effectiveness of conventional models for predicting extubation outcomes and analyzed the factors influencing extubation results at high altitudes, laying the groundwork for clinical use and future research. Nevertheless, further research will see advantages in using multicentric approaches and broadening clinical indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.