ArticleCommunications medicine2025
An analysis of One Health timeliness metrics across multisectoral public health emergencies in Uganda.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimeliness metrics offer countries a framework by which to assess and optimize speed in outbreak detection and response times. This study analyses the One Health timeliness metrics for multisectoral public health emergencies in Uganda to identify and explore factors influencing outbreak performance.
methodsWe compiled a database of outbreak events in Uganda occurring between 2018-2022 and involving the human, animal, plant, and environmental sectors. Outbreak milestone dates were extracted from reports to calculate timeliness metrics, which were analyzed using proportional hazards regression models. Concurrently, we conducted Key Informant Interviews to explore factors affecting detection and response timeliness.
resultsIntegrated analyses of timeliness metrics from 81 outbreaks and expert interviews reveal that the greatest predictors of improved timeliness are frequent past experience with similar disease outbreaks and whether an outbreak is a viral hemorrhagic fever due to heightened perceived threat and pre-existing preparedness measures. Other factors, including diagnostic and laboratory considerations and contextual influences, such as One Health collaborations, are also described as relevant to timeliness.
conclusionsTo complement positive timeliness trends in Uganda, disease-agnostic investments in outbreak preparedness and response efforts will facilitate the ability of health systems to rapidly detect and respond to all outbreaks, irrespective of the pathogen.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.