Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404832›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2025

Synapse vulnerability and resilience across the clinical spectrum of dementias.

Raquel N Taddei, Karen E Duff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Beyond Amyloid: Lessons From Atherosclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From correlation to causation: cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Primary age-related tauopathy.Acta neuropathologica · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raquel N TaddeiNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. raquel.taddei.20@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9557-3754
Karen E DuffUK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-868X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation of synapses is crucial for healthy cognitive ageing, and synapse loss is one of the closest anatomical correlates of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal dementia. In these conditions, some synapses seem particularly vulnerable to degeneration whereas others are resilient and remain preserved. Evidence has highlighted that vulnerability and resilience are intrinsically distinct phenomena linked to specific brain structural and/or functional signatures, yet the key features of vulnerable and resilient synapses in the dementias remain incompletely understood. Defining the characteristics of vulnerable and resilient synapses in each form of dementia could offer novel insight into the mechanisms of synapse preservation and of synapse loss that underlies cognitive decline, thereby facilitating the discovery of targeted biomarkers and disease-modifying therapies. In this Review, we consider the concepts of synapse vulnerability and resilience, and provide an overview of our current understanding of the associations between synaptic protein changes, neuropathology and cognitive decline. We also consider how understanding of the underlying mechanisms could identify novel strategies to mitigate the cognitive dysfunction associated with dementias.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainCognitive DysfunctionDementiaSynapsesFrontotemporal DementiaHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.