ArticleScientific reports2025
Optical trapping stability of different irregularly shaped microplastic particles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plastic pollution has become a major environmental issue. Waste degrades into microplastics and nanoplastics, which contaminate water, soil, and air, and affect ecosystems and food sources. To elucidate the effects of microplastics on cellular systems, it is essential to comprehend their properties and manipulation at the microscopic scale. This work examines the optical trapping stability of different irregularly shaped laboratory-synthesized, mechanically weathered microplastics: polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). We conducted a statistical assessment of optical trapping stability, considering factors such as particle material, color-induced absorption, size, and response to different optical trapping wavelengths (473 nm, 780 nm, and 820 nm). Additionally, we compared these results with the predicted optical trapping stability, simulated for particles with two types of spheroidal shapes. Our results indicate that non-spherical PP microplastics exhibit the highest stability in a single-beam optical trap, while PET microplastics demonstrate the lowest stability. The optical trapping stability of PP and HDPE microplastics is relatively size-independent; however, PET particles larger than 10 μm are three times less likely to be stably trapped than smaller particles. Furthermore, non-transparent materials with higher absorption rates cause less stable optical trapping of microplastics for all three material types. The insights gained regarding the optical properties of irregularly shaped microplastics will help future research on the optically controlled interactions of naturally occurring microplastics with cells and microorganisms at the single-cell level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.