ArticleScientific reports2025
Micromagnetic simulations with periodic strayfield calculation of soft magnetic composite-materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work provides a complete numeric framework, with which soft magnetic composite materials can be numerically analyzed through a combination of two distinct numerical methods. Key soft magnetic properties connected to energy efficiency, namely the permeability and the energy-loss can be predicted. The latter consists of different contributions. These contributions are treated separately in our work and therefore 2 decoupled numerical models are required to fully encompass these materials. Experimentally established concepts with the aim to improve magnetic properties for soft magnetic materials have been simulated, resulting in trends that agree well with the experimentally measured improvements. Moreover, we analyze the distinct loss contributions-an uncommon practice in experimental physics-providing valuable insights into the working principles of these materials, and therefore understanding which contributions become dominant under which conditions. Furthermore measurements of iron powders were conducted, in order to compare the numerical simulations with experimental data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.