ArticleScientific reports2025
Bio inspired feature selection and graph learning for sepsis risk stratification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging time-series electronic health records with large language models for chronic kidney disease diagnosis in primary care.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- An intelligent healthcare framework for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis based on aggregated learners from biomedical data utilising explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A consensus-weighted multi-agent ensemble feature selection framework for antibiotic susceptibility prediction in pediatric respiratory diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in critical care settings, necessitating timely and accurate risk stratification. However, existing machine learning models for sepsis prediction often suffer from poor interpretability, limited generalizability across diverse patient populations, and challenges in handling class imbalance and high-dimensional clinical data. To address these gaps, this study proposes a novel framework that integrates bio-inspired feature selection and graph-based deep learning for enhanced sepsis risk prediction. Using the MIMIC-IV dataset, we employ the Wolverine Optimization Algorithm (WoOA) to select clinically relevant features, followed by a Generative Pre-Training Graph Neural Network (GPT-GNN) that models complex patient relationships through self-supervised learning. To further improve predictive accuracy, the TOTO metaheuristic algorithm is applied for model fine-tuning. SMOTE is used to balance the dataset and mitigate bias toward the majority class. Experimental results show that our model outperforms traditional classifiers such as SVM, XGBoost, and LightGBM in terms of accuracy, AUC, and F1-score, while also providing interpretable mortality indicators. This research contributes a scalable and high-performing decision support tool for sepsis risk stratification in real-world clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.