Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

AutoGIS-driven solar pond site selection for water treatment in Africa aligned with the NEXUS framework.

Mahmoud Fatehy Altahan, Mohamed Nower

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahmoud Fatehy AltahanCentral Laboratory for Environmental Quality Monitoring (CLEQM), National Water Research Center (NWRC), El-Qanater El-Khairia, 13621, Egypt. mahmoud_abdalqader@nwrc.gov.eg.
Mohamed NowerWater Management Research Institute (WMRI), National Water Research Center (NWRC), El-Qanater El-Khairia, 13621, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to clean and safe water remains a critical challenge across many regions in Africa. This study investigates the potential of solar ponds as wastewater treatment facilities by employing AutoGIS processing and DBSCAN clustering to identify suitable development sites across the African continent and its five regions: North, East, West, Central, and Southern Africa. By integrating environmental data such as solar radiation, wind speed, temperature, clear sky, cloud cover, and precipitation, this research highlights the effectiveness of geospatial tools in addressing clean water access issues. The findings reveal distinct suitability patterns for solar pond development at both continental and regional levels. Key environmental factors, notably direct normal radiation (DNR), temperature, and wind speed, consistently expanded the areas identified as suitable, while cloud cover demonstrated a positive effect. Precipitation showed minimal variation, particularly in Central Africa. Importantly, the study underscores the capability of DBSCAN clustering in handling large datasets, filtering noise, and capturing nuanced regional differences, which varied significantly from continent-wide trends. By streamlining the site selection process, this research offers practical insights into leveraging geospatial technologies to address water access challenges in Africa. The integration of AutoGIS and DBSCAN provides a scalable approach for analyzing complex environmental datasets, paving the way for more informed and sustainable development of wastewater treatment solutions across diverse regions.

Indexed as

AutoGIS processingDBSCAN clusteringPython programmingSite selectionSolar ponds

Identifiers

PMID40404750
PMCPMC12098993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.