ArticleScientific reports2025
Understanding generational differences in digital skills and recreational behaviour for effective visitor management in forest destinations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences in Sports Learning by Digital Literacy Level Among Generation Z: An Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Media Richness Theory (MRT).Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digitalisation is reshaping how people interact with natural environments, particularly in the context of outdoor recreation. This study examines generational differences in digital skills and recreational behaviour and their implications for visitor management in urban forests. Based on an online panel survey conducted in the Vienna metropolitan area (n = 3,121), we identified four distinct visitor profiles using Self-Organizing Maps: All-rounders (49.6%), Traditional Planners and Navigators (17.2%), Tech-Savvy Navigators (14.5%), and Balanced Adapters (18.7%). These clusters differ in both digital competence and used information sources used for planning and navigating forest visits. Significant relationships were found between generational groups and visitor profiles: older adults (Baby Boomers, Traditionalists) were featured more prominently among Traditional Planners, while younger generations (Generation Z, Millennials) were more prevalent in the Tech-Savvy group. Balanced Adapters included older individuals transitioning towards digital tool use. Further, our findings highlight that younger users reported less frequent forest visits than older cohorts. These insights underscore the need for inclusive, hybrid infrastructure and communication strategies that address varying recreational needs, including trip planning and navigation behaviours. This study contributes to forest management and nearby recreation planning by revealing a generational gap in technology use in digitally evolving societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.