ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic effect of body roundness index on all-cause mortality among US older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk association and diagnostic value of body roundness index for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Biosociodemographic, Anthropometric, and Laboratory Profiles Associated with the Risk of Developing Chronic Kidney Disease Among Older Adults Living in Quilombola Communities: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Association of cumulative exposure and change patterns of triglyceride-glucose index combined with novel obesity indices with glycemic transitions in prediabetes: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- Associations of body roundness index with steatotic liver disease and mortality from the UK biobank cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Body Roundness Index Mediates the Association Between Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Novel Anthropometric Indices and Probability of Adequate Nutrient Intake in the Older Polish Population.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Body Rounds Index (BRI) is an anthropometric indicator specifically developed to evaluate an individual's obesity level, particularly emphasizing central or abdominal obesity. This study aimed to explore the relationship between BRI and all-cause mortality in older U.S. adults. The research sample comprised individuals aged 65 and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), eligible for mortality analyses between 1999 and 2018. We utilized Cox regression analyses, restricted cubic spline (RCS), threshold effects analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess how the BRI correlates with all-cause mortality among older adults in the U.S. To further ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses. Among 5371 U.S. older adults (age ≥ 65), with an average age of 72.45 (standard deviation [SD]:5.65) years, 2884 (60%) were women. During the follow-up period, there were 2781 deaths from all causes among the 5371 participants. After adjusting for all covariates, a U-shaped association was identified between BRI and the all cause mortality. Compared to a BRI of less than 4.457, a BRI between 4.457 and 5.538 was associated with a 19% reduction in the likelihood of mortality from any cause (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69-0.95). A BRI between 5.538 and 6.888 was linked to a 8% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79-1.07), while a BRI exceeding 6.888 showed a 1% increase in this risk (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87-1.17). RCS analysis indicated a U-shaped relationship between BRI and all-cause mortality. The turning point was located at 4.546, with correlations observed both before and after this point. This NHANES-based study highlights the U-shaped relationship between BRI and all-cause mortality among U.S. older adults, suggesting that the BRI has predictive value for mortality outcomes. The findings offer compelling support for utilizing BRI as a non-invasive mortality risk screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.