ArticleScientific reports2025
Aducanumab delivery via focused ultrasound-induced transient blood-brain barrier opening in vivo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focused ultrasound for cellular mechanoactivation and nanomedicine delivery in cancer.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Review
- Ethical Considerations in Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Disorders of Consciousness.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2026Article
- From brain waves to heartbeats: Exploring the combined role of electroencephalography and heart-rate variability in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and management.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Review
- Review
- Intranasal vs. Device-Assisted Drug Delivery: Advantages and Limitations for the Delivery of Biopharmaceuticals to the CNS.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Ultrasound in Women's Health: Mechanisms, Applications, and Emerging Opportunities.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Focused ultrasound (FUS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance (MRgFUS) has emerged as a promising technique for enhancing drug delivery to the brain. Through the controlled oscillation of gas-encased microbubbles, FUS temporarily modulates the integrity of tight junctions, inducing localized blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) and allowing targeted drug passage. Aducanumab (ADU) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing amyloid pathology, yet its clinical application remains limited by the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This in vivo study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of ADU delivery facilitated by FUS-induced BBBD in the normal Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mouse brain under two pressure conditions: 0.25 and 0.42 MPa. Following FUS sonication with MRI guidance, ADU concentrations in brain tissues and serum were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at multiple time points. Histological analysis at 24 h post-FUS-BBBD was performed to assess ADU distribution, and tissue integrity was evaluated through hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Nissl staining to detect potential damage in the target regions. The results demonstrated that MRgFUS significantly increased ADU concentrations within the target areas without inducing substantial tissue damage. ADU delivery efficiency was directly correlated with the degree of BBBD, exhibiting a 7-fold increase at 0.25 MPa and a 60-fold increase at 0.42 MPa compared to sham controls, with distinct kinetic profiles observed for each condition. These findings highlight the potential of FUS-BBBD as a therapeutic strategy to enhance ADU delivery to the brain, reduce required infusion doses, and mitigate side effects associated with high-dose administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.