ArticleScientific reports2025
Accessible interactive learning of missing-digit arithmetic problems for students with visual disabilities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the advancements in digital learning, students with visual disabilities face significant challenges in mathematics, particularly in solving arithmetic problems like missing digit identification in addition and subtraction. The insufficient availability of accessible tools with real-time feedback mechanisms, error correction features, and interactive learning methods leads to these challenges. This study proposes a novel solution to address these challenges by developing an algorithm designed to assist students with visual disabilities solve missing digit arithmetic problems. The algorithm systematically identifies missing digits and provides step-by-step audio instructions, ensuring adherence to mathematical principles and pedagogical standards. Real-time validation and adaptive computations for carry and borrow operations enhance learning. Implemented in Python, the solution was empirically tested with 40 participants, including students and instructors, with visual disabilities. The results from both qualitative and quantitative analyses indicate substantial improvements in learning outcomes, suggesting that this solution can effectively support inclusive mathematics education and be adapted to other assistive learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.