ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable prediction of drug synergy for breast cancer by random forest with features from Boolean modeling of signaling pathways.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- STAT3 signaling inhibitors for cancer treatment.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2026Review
- Graph neural networks for multi-scale gene-drug interaction modeling in cancer: applications, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities for breast cancer drug resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Uncovering the mechanisms of synergistic drug combinations in non-small cell lung cancer through metagene-based classification.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is a complex and challenging disease to treat, and despite progress in combating it, drug resistance remains a significant hindrance. Drug combinations have shown promising results in improving therapeutic outcomes, and many machine learning models have been proposed to identify potential drug combinations. Recently, there has been a growing emphasis on enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models to improve our biological understanding of the drug mechanisms underlying the predictions. In this study, we developed a random forest model using simulated protein activities derived from Boolean modeling of breast cancer signaling pathways as input features. The model demonstrates a moderate Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.40 between the predicted and experimentally observed synergistic scores, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67. Despite its moderate performance, the model offers insights into the interpretable mechanisms behind its predictions. The model's input features consist solely of the individual protein activities simulated in response to drug treatments. Therefore, the framework allows for the analysis of each protein's contribution to the synergy level of each drug pair, enabling a direct interpretation of the drugs' actions on the signaling networks of breast cancer. We demonstrated the interpretability of our approach by identifying proteins responsible for drug resistance and sensitivity in specific cell lines. For example, the analysis revealed that the combination of MEK and STAT3 inhibitors exhibits only a moderate synergistic effect on MDA-MB-468 due to the negative contributions of mTORC1 and NF-κB that diminish the efficacy of the drug pair. The model further predicted that hyperactive PTEN would sensitize the cells to the drug pair. Our framework enhances the understanding of drug mechanisms at the level of the signaling pathways, potentially leading to more effective treatment designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.