Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404669›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A Multimodal Dataset of Cardiac, Electrodermal, and Environmental Signals.

Cezar Anicai, Muhammad Zeeshan Shakir

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cezar AnicaiUniversity of the West of Scotland, School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, Paisley, PA1 2BE, United Kingdom. cezar.anicai@uws.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3635-0502
Muhammad Zeeshan ShakirUniversity of the West of Scotland, School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, Paisley, PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a rapidly evolving technological landscape across various industries, the emergence of real-time, context-aware solutions for health monitoring holds great promise. The dataset presented here encompasses signals from two domains. Ambient environment signals and physiological responses are captured to provide context for well-being assessment. Cardiac activity and electrodermal activity were selected as health indicators, while indoor ambient conditions were characterized by parameters such as temperature, humidity, light, sound, pressure and air quality as determined by Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Particulate Matter (PM). Data collection involved 14 participants, with each participant contributing approximately 48 minutes of data. This process resulted in a total of over 600 minutes of data, recorded under varied indoor ambient conditions. This dataset was utilized for classifying ambient environment risks concerning long-term cardiac health and for estimating physiological responses exclusively from ambient environment parameters. The compiled dataset provides opportunities for examining the connections between indoor climates and individuals' well-being states in diverse environments, thereby enabling additional investigations and applications in the domain of context-aware technology.

Indexed as

Galvanic Skin ResponseHeartEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticulate MatterVolatile Organic CompoundsParticulate MatterVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID40404669
PMCPMC12098987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.