ArticleNPJ breast cancer2025
Predicting pathologic ≥N2 disease in women with breast cancer.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer with 1-of-1 and 2-of-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Is There a Therapeutic Benefit of Axillary Surgery in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer? A SEER Cohort Database Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The distinction between pN1 and ≥pN2 breast cancer impacts treatment decisions. Using data from a single institution on women with cN0 invasive breast cancer who were treated with upfront surgery, had 1-3 positive SLNs, and underwent completion ALND, we used gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) to develop a model for predicting ≥pN2 disease using clinicopathologic variables. Model performance was tested in a held-out subsample (20%) and validated using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Of 3574 patients with cN0 breast cancer, 587 underwent upfront surgery and had 1-3 positive SLNs. Of these, 415 (70.7%) underwent completion ALND, with 64 (15.4%) having ≥pN2 disease. The trained algorithm had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.97) in the held-out test data, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.79) in recent NCDB data where completion ALND was much less commonly performed. The number of positive SLNs and the total number of SLNs removed had the greatest influence on model predictions in the held-out test data. The developed model effectively estimates the probability of ≥pN2 disease in cN0 patients with positive SLNs, providing guidance for the management of patients with breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.