Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404657›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2025

Predicting pathologic ≥N2 disease in women with breast cancer.

Kerollos Nashat Wanis, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Taiwo Adesoye, Henry M Kuerer, Abigail S Caudle, Nina Tamirisa, Sarah M DeSnyder, Susie X Sun and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kerollos Nashat WanisDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Wenli DongDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Taiwo AdesoyeDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Henry M KuererDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abigail S CaudleDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nina TamirisaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sarah M DeSnyderDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Susie X SunDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Isabelle BedrosianDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Puneet SinghDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Solange E CoxDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly K HuntDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rosa F HwangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. RHwang@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distinction between pN1 and ≥pN2 breast cancer impacts treatment decisions. Using data from a single institution on women with cN0 invasive breast cancer who were treated with upfront surgery, had 1-3 positive SLNs, and underwent completion ALND, we used gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) to develop a model for predicting ≥pN2 disease using clinicopathologic variables. Model performance was tested in a held-out subsample (20%) and validated using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Of 3574 patients with cN0 breast cancer, 587 underwent upfront surgery and had 1-3 positive SLNs. Of these, 415 (70.7%) underwent completion ALND, with 64 (15.4%) having ≥pN2 disease. The trained algorithm had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.97) in the held-out test data, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.79) in recent NCDB data where completion ALND was much less commonly performed. The number of positive SLNs and the total number of SLNs removed had the greatest influence on model predictions in the held-out test data. The developed model effectively estimates the probability of ≥pN2 disease in cN0 patients with positive SLNs, providing guidance for the management of patients with breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID40404657
PMCPMC12098822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.